Important Lessons from the Apple Watch Patent Dispute

Apple, a tech giant renowned for its cutting-edge devices, recently found itself in a patent dispute with Masimo over the blood oxygen sensors in its Ultra 2 and Series 9 smartwatches. The International Trade Commission (ITC) temporarily banned the sale and import of these watches, citing a violation of Masimo’s patents.

In response, Apple sought a temporary halt to the ban, exploring modifications to the blood oxygen sensors to address the infringement concerns. When the U.S. Court of Appeals did not grant the temporary stay, Apple removed the sensors in order to continue selling the watches. This move is a testament to the complexity and significance of intellectual property issues in the tech industry.

The heart of the dispute lies in Masimo’s claim that Apple, after hiring key executives from Masimo, incorporated patented technology into its smartwatches without reaching a licensing agreement. Apple vehemently disagrees with the ITC ruling and has appealed the decision, setting the stage for a legal showdown that could reshape the trajectory of this technological saga.

Avoiding Patent Disputes: Precautions for Employers

The Apple-Masimo case underscores the importance of taking precautions when hiring talent with knowledge of a competitor’s products. To steer clear of potential legal pitfalls, consider the following measures:

  1. Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA): Begin with a robust NDA, clearly outlining the confidential nature of proprietary information and the consequences of unauthorized disclosure.
  2. Employee Agreement: Embed specific clauses in employment contracts emphasizing the employee’s obligations regarding intellectual property, including refraining from using or disclosing former employers’ confidential information.
  3. Documented Independence: Encourage new employees to work independently and avoid using specific details or knowledge gained from their previous job.
  4. Avoidance of Specifics: During discussions about the competitor’s products, keep conversations at a general and high-level understanding, avoiding divulging proprietary technical details.
  5. Educate the New Hire: Make sure the new employee is aware of the legal implications of using another company’s proprietary information and provide training on respecting intellectual property rights.
  6. Prior Review: Conduct a thorough review of existing patents or published materials related to the product in question before commencing development work.
  7. Legal Consultation: Seek legal advice to ensure hiring practices and the new employee’s work do not infringe on existing patents or intellectual property rights.
  8. Innovation and Redesign: Encourage innovation and the development of new solutions rather than replicating exact methods or technologies used by the previous employer.

Balancing the utilization of new talent’s expertise with ethical and legal considerations is essential. By adopting these precautions, companies can minimize the risk of patent disputes and foster a culture of innovation that respects intellectual property rights. As the Apple-Masimo case unfolds, it serves as a poignant reminder of the intricate dance between technological advancement and legal responsibility in the business landscape.

Does your company need to operationalize these strategies for avoiding patent disputes? Visit to get started.


Contact Pearson IP

 Pearson IP offers a customizable range of services to help protect your business.

Before we get started, we want to know your goals so we can better determine how to position you success. Reach out to us today. 

(305) 709-0750
333 SE 2nd Avenue
Suite 2000
Miami, FL 33131

General Contact

Our Monthly Newsletter
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.