Is Copyright Enough? The Big Fight Against Wordle Clones

In the world of intellectual property, copyright serves as a vital tool for protecting original works. However, recent events surrounding the New York Times’ battle against Wordle “clones” underscore the limitations of copyright alone in defending creative assets. The nuances of this copyright saga are a great lesson on why relying solely on copyright may not suffice in safeguarding intellectual property.

The Wordle Clone Conundrum: A Copyright Quagmire

Following Wordle’s explosive popularity online, a wave of imitative games flooded the market, prompting swift legal action from the New York Times to protect its intellectual property rights. Hundreds of developers found themselves on the receiving end of Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedown notices, citing infringement on the Times’ ownership of the Wordle name and its distinctive gameplay elements.

The Limitations of Copyright Protection

While copyright offers essential safeguards for creative works, its scope is not all-encompassing. In the case of Wordle, the Times’ copyright claims face several challenges, highlighting the complexity of intellectual property protection:

  1. Game Rules vs. Copyrightable Elements: Copyright does not extend to the rules of a game, including its layout or gameplay mechanics. As such, the distinctive six-by-five grid featured in Wordle may not be eligible for copyright protection, as it is dictated by the rules of the game itself.
  2. Limited Coverage of Color and Graphics: The absence of color or graphics in Wordle’s copyright registration poses a challenge in defending these elements against infringement. While some media companies have successfully copyrighted color schemes in the past, Wordle’s current registration may not provide sufficient coverage for its visual elements.
  3. Trademark vs. Copyright Enforcement: The inclusion of Wordle’s trademark in DMCA notices raises questions about the appropriate use of copyright and trademark enforcement mechanisms. While trademark law offers protection for brand names and logos, its application in DMCA takedown notices may blur the lines between copyright and trademark enforcement.

The Importance of Comprehensive IP Strategies

The Wordle clone saga serves as a reminder of the importance of holistic intellectual property strategies. While copyright provides essential protections for creative works, it may not be sufficient on its own to defend against infringement. Companies and creators must adopt comprehensive IP strategies that encompass a range of legal tools, including copyright, trademark, and trade secret protections.

Looking Ahead: IP Law is Complex

As digital creativity continues to evolve, understanding the complexities of intellectual property law remains paramount. While copyright serves as a foundational pillar of IP protection, its limitations underscore the need for a multifaceted approach to safeguarding creative assets in an increasingly interconnected world.

Luckily, we’re here to help you understand the limitations of copyright and adopt comprehensive IP strategies. Let’s talk about your original work and how to best protect your intellectual property rights in an ever-changing digital environment.


Contact Pearson IP

 Pearson IP offers a customizable range of services to help protect your business.

Before we get started, we want to know your goals so we can better determine how to position you success. Reach out to us today. 

(305) 709-0750
333 SE 2nd Avenue
Suite 2000
Miami, FL 33131

General Contact

Our Monthly Newsletter
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.